Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Shock As Renowned Liar Found To Have Made Things Up.

Johann Hari has been caught stealing quotes made by interviewees with other journalists and attributing it as his own work.

It has been clear for years that Johann Hari is a liar, and that he makes things up. Even if you don't include claims that seem preposterous but can't actually be disproved the evidence is overwhelming.

Private Eye discovered Hari's propensity to lie back in 2003:

Not that startling, surely, especially if they are regular readers of Johann Hari. He began his career as the voice of yoof in July 2001, just after finishing his university finals, by boasting about his drug habit to the readers of the New Statesman. “Another Cambridge May Week has rolled around,” he wrote, “and I, like half of Cambridge, celebrated with a few tabs of Ecstasy and the odd line of coke.”
Fleet Street editors were thrilled: the Sindie reprinted his piece, and a few months later the London Evening Standard invited him to do an encore. Hari obliged by defending “the Ecstasy I know and love” against the tut-tutting of the Home Secretary. “Clearly, David Blunket needs to be informed of the basic facts about one of Britain’s most popular drugs,” he raved. “If he fancies tying one, I’ll be happy to take him to a decent club. But in the meantime, I’ll try to explain why so many of use the drug weekly.” He duly went on to describe the sensation of being “loved up” and “at one.”
In fact, however, the young rascal had never taken Ecstasy: before writing his lyrical account he had to phone a friend and ask what it felt like! And now, less than two years later, he has already forgotten his brief incarnation as an e-fiend. “Ecstasy defined the generation of my older siblings, not mine,” he wrote in the Indie two weeks ago. “Ecstasy is out.”
No matter: it served its purpose, and Hari was on a roll. A couple of weeks after his original ecstasy article he went to Genoa for the G8 summit and sent a vivid dispatch to the New Statesman about the death of anti-globalisation protester Carlo Giuliani. “On Friday, before the real business of the summit began, the police shot him twice in the head and then ran him over,” he reported. “They killed him, even though he carried no weapon other than a fire extinguisher. When I saw the scene, I couldn’t believe so much blood had poured from just one body.” Yet, as several witnesses can attest, Hari wasn’t there, having hailed a taxi to escape the scene some time before Giuliani was killed.
Now that he’s a full-fledged pundit, Hari has been pontificating in the Indie and on Newsnight about his support for a war against Saddam Hussein. The Iraqis want to be bombed, he says, even if more than 100,000 of them die: he knows, because he’s been there and talked to them. “Last October, I spent a month as a journalist seeing the reality of life under Saddam Hussein,” he wrote on 10 January. “Most of the Iraqi people I encountered…. Would hug me and offer coded support.”
Actually, Hari spent two weeks in Iraq as a holidaymaker, on a package tour visiting ancient archaeological sites. He wrote about the trip in the Guardian on 3 December last year. In that article, however, he complained that it was “very difficult to get Iraqis to express their feelings… I blundered about asking fairly direct political questions, which caused people to recoil in horror… Many people asked quite genuinely ‘why your government hates the Arab world’.” He also met many “dignified, stoical Iraqis” and “doe-eyed children” who complained about western sanctions.
The only person who eventually offered “coded support” was an old man in a souk who had visited London in the 1970s. “After much oblique prodding, he said warmly, ‘I admire British democracy and freedom.’ He held my gaze. ’I very much admire them.’ He added, ’We do not know what is coming. The news we receive here is… unclear.’”
And, er, that’s it. Yet in an Indie column on 15 February, Hari claimed that people in Iraq asked him: “When will you come to free us? When will we be able to live again?” Since these pleas from Iraqis yearning for the bombers to arrive must surely have struck him as newsworthy, why didn’t he mention them in his original Guardian feature?
Answer comes there none. The only question troubling this journalistic wunderkind at the moment is why on earth British newspaper readers suspect that hacks “just make up stories.”

Since 2003 he has carried on lying- inventing an interview with a jihadist who had slashed the throats of 4 female Israeli soldiers (no such incident has ever happened). He was also caught out claiming to have interviewed a former Iraqi human shield volunteer who had seen the light, which was equally bogus.

Johann Hari has been making things up for over a decade and yet he remains a national newspaper columnist and a regular talking head on various BBC programmes. Maybe this latest scandal will sink him but it probably won't and even if it does his presence will be filled with another fabulist like Laurie Penny or someone like that.

8 comments:

Mark Wadsworth said...

Laurie Penny? A fantasist? Do you mean the former burlesque dancer who writes the delightful porn* for Guardian?

* Not sex-related porn, obviously, but "How Britain is suffering under the cuts" porn or "How women are still oppressed by men" porn etc.

Blognor Regis said...

Giggle. First comment:

"A couple expressed worries that if he'd lie about that, he'd lie about other things too."

http://whatsheonaboutnow.blogspot.com/2011/06/is-this-johann-hari-business-death.html

Ross said...

Mark- there were some quotes from people at the various protests that were clearly made up.

BR- It almost seems cruel to let such a naive couple down by telling the truth about Hari.

JuliaM said...

The 'interviewedbyHari' Twitter tag has provided an immense amount of amusement so far...

staybryte said...

Fat boy has cleared his name in an imaginary interview

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/arts-%26-entertainment/hari-defends-himself-during-pretend-parkinson-interview-201106294011/

Ross said...

Starbryte- I saw that, it's brilliant isn't it!

Peter said...

What I find worrying is that he says that he only embellished the interviews to help the subject, whom he reveres so much, make their case as well as possible. So what happens when he interviews people he doesn't respect? Does he feel entitled to insert quotes to make them sound dumber than they are? I mean, this interview with Busted:

http://www.johannhari.com/2003/12/22/busted-an-interview

How can we trust anything he says now?

Ross said...

Peter- I think it is clear that he has done that on occasions like going on National Review's cruise etc.

Fun Busted fact- Charlie Simpson went on to become a successful heavy metal musician who is treated pretty seriously by the likes of Kerrang Radio.