The simple answer for why the Rotherham sex abuse scandal happened- and why similar cases have occurred in other towns and cities in the UK- is that no one knows for sure although educated guesses can be made.
This is because race has become such a taboo that the problem was not officially acknowledged for a decade and even now most* respectable media outlets start from the assumption that "it is has nothing to do with race" and then work backwards to support their predetermined conclusion.
The reasons for the taboo about prominently discussing ethnic issues exists for reasons that are somewhat understandable. No one doubts that in the past sweeping generalisations about racial groups have been employed by demagogues to whip up racial pogroms or justify treating people as second class citizens because of who they are.
There are more cynical reasons too- politicians wanting votes from ethnic minorities and "community leaders" wanting grants but the aversion to talking about race is sincere in most cases.
There are two kinds of problems with this approach, it is morally wrong and it doesn't work. The truth has a habit of coming out eventually. The strenuous efforts by Rotherham Council, South Yorkshire Police and others to conceal the fact that Pakistanigangs were systematically targeting vulnerable young girls has to put it mildly backfired in a spectacular manner.
Honesty is the only way of discussing race that has a chance of succeeding in the long term. In this case it has to be acknowledged that there is a specifically Pakistani (not "Asian" or "Muslim" but Pakistani) problem that needs to be identified and ended.
* Some media outlets deserve praise, the Times's Andrew Norfolk exposed the problem years ago but was ignored.
On The Seventh Day Of Trumpmas, Twitter Gave To Me…
21 minutes ago
9 comments:
"Honesty is the only way of discussing race that has a chance of succeeding in the long term."
Spot on. I find that one effect of the race taboo has been a problem collecting good information.
Whatever the language used, I have a tendency to assume that writers who highlight such issues could be spinning a racist line.
"Whatever the language used, I have a tendency to assume that writers who highlight such issues could be spinning a racist line".
And that Sunshine is the root of the problem, not collecting information.
This shit has been known about for over a decade, and it isn't an isolated case either. Anne Cryer (Labour MP for Keighley) brought this up there about 10 years ago.
Anne Cryer has made quite a few points about immigration that should have been listened to over the years such as on the issue of forced marriage.
You should send a copy of this post to Hugh Muir at CiF - the denial is strong in that one...
I tweeted about Hugh Muir's piece, but it's so absurd it almost defies parody.
My word, the lefty spammers are positively short stroking over this one eh? Can't think why??
I can understand opposing points of view and all that, but when you get them flooding comments with totally random meaningless shite, you're obviously hitting nerves..
Budvar- which spammers are you referring to?
I have follow ups set to email, so I get them there. Moderation seems to oik them out from here.
Yep, this refusal to name the race has been the biggy but I'm not sure, if forced to do so once, they'll do it again.
Post a Comment