The Times are apparantly planning to unmask the anonymous police blogger 'Nightjack'. They are behaving deplorably. That is all.
Update: If this post about the journalist doing the outing is correct, then you'd have thought that he had more respect for privacy wouldn't you?
Hiring From The 'Mail' Pool, Standard?
51 minutes ago
2 comments:
I've not read about it in detail, but the court decisions seems right, I mean no-one has a right to anonynmity (I can't even spell it..er..I think that's right). That's a different thing though than your point which is what the Times should have done.
Agreed.
Post a Comment