The Times are apparantly planning to unmask the anonymous police blogger 'Nightjack'. They are behaving deplorably. That is all.
Update: If this post about the journalist doing the outing is correct, then you'd have thought that he had more respect for privacy wouldn't you?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I've not read about it in detail, but the court decisions seems right, I mean no-one has a right to anonynmity (I can't even spell it..er..I think that's right). That's a different thing though than your point which is what the Times should have done.
Agreed.
Post a Comment