If controlling suspects by restraining their hands is a violation of the Geneva Conventions then yes it does. Of course if this is a violation of the Geneva Conventions then who gives a fuck about the Geneva Conventions?
But were they cheaper than Amazon?
12 minutes ago
3 comments:
So the Geneva convention gives those bent on killing our soldiers in action more protection than we have against private security guards who can be "authorised" to handcuff us ?
"then who gives a fuck about the Geneva Conventions"
The Army?
As none of the men on the ground are wearing the uniform of a nation's army they're not covered by the Geneva Convention if they were combatants captured during conflict.
Post a Comment