Or 21/5 trutherism if you prefer. As many people will know the renowned American metallurgist Rosie O'Donnell debunked the idea that the World Trade Center could have collapsed by the means that have been presented to the mainstream media, because fire doesn't melt steel. Many of the Bu$Hitler zionist illuminati dismissed O'Donnell's point by pointing to examples of fire melting steel such as the Oakland bridge incident last month.
Now however we are being told that the fire on the Cutty Sark might not have been as disasterous as it first appeared to be because the Iron frame wasn't damaged by the fire. So clearly Rosie O'Donnell has been thoroughly vindicated.
Bramber Green: From bombsite to stone circle
3 hours ago
1 comment:
As a problem pedant I'm chomping at the bit here, you git. I'm ready to mention differences between burning wood versus burning kerosene and melting points of steel versus iron. But I know you're only yanking my chain. But even so...
Post a Comment