Friday, April 16, 2010

Mea Culpa

I suppose I should acknowledge that my confident assertion that the leaders' debate would have no major impact appears to have been very wrong.

Any explanations as to why the debate has provided such a big boost?

2 comments:

Mark Wadsworth said...

It was a competition to see who could evade the real issues while lying most convincingly, in which Nick Clegg won hands down, fair play to him.

wh00ps said...

Brown was a shambles. They offered the nation a choice between two snake-oil salesmen and a stammering, broken derelict.
That said, that's only a poll of the sort of people who answer polls. I still haven.t heard the debate mentioned among 'real people.'